Why RIP (Rest In Peace) is not compatible with Hinduism concept ?
🔸RIP (Rest in Peace) 🔸:
Is this correct to say ❓❓
-------------------------------
-Each soul makes the journey towards its own true nature, slowly but surely. Sometimes slipping and sliding back but ever on its way forward.
Leaving one body only to be reborn in another is considered like a change of clothes ie only external changes while the internal Atma continues on it's journey to Mukti. Other answers to this question claim incorrectly that RIP is same as Shanti, but "Shanti not equal to Peace and Atma not equal to Soul".

Soul is not reborn, nor is it able to find divinity within itself as per abrahamic religion doctrine. RIP is a concept from these other religions which say there is only one life and the soul rests till judgement day. On the contrary, Shanti is only for an Atma disturbed by trauma of leaving the body, or carrying over disturbed feelings into next life.
Hindus should used following terms for departed souls:So, RIP is not at all compatible with Hinduism concepts of karma and cycle of life and death. In fact it might even be considered to an 'abhishaap' or curse as atma would no longer be able to evolve to mukti in future lives but would get locked into a standstill!! Certainly not an intended outcome, is it?!!
Hindus should used following terms for departed souls:
1. May the soul achieve the highest abode.
2. May soul achieve Moksha
3. May soul achieves Vaikuntha/Devaloka (heaven)
Source:
1. https://www.quora.com/What-is-an-expression-analogous-to-rest-in-peace-in-Hinduism
2.https://www.facebook.com/WorldwideHinduTemples/photos/a.390759174403283/1360300314115826/?type=3&theater
Comments
Post a Comment